|
OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT |
|
|
L123 |
Decision on the inherent distinctiveness of an application for a European Union trade mark
(Article 7 EUTMR)
Alicante, 30/08/2019
FIELDFISHER LLP
IP Protection Department
8th Floor
Riverbank House
2 Swan Lane
London EC4R 3TT
UNITED KINGDOM
Application No: |
018033502 |
Your reference: |
UK01-2002961.00043/JA3 |
Trade mark: |
Quick Measure
|
Mark type: |
Word mark |
Applicant: |
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 129, Samsung-ro, Yeongtong-gu Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do - KOREAN REPUBLIC |
The Office raised an objection on 24/04/2019 pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(2) EUTMR because it found that the trade mark applied for is not eligible for registration, for the reasons set out in the attached letter, which forms an integral part of this decision.
In the present case, the relevant consumers would perceive the sign as providing information that the goods applied for are software applications for smartphone cameras whose function is to provide fast measurements of distances, for example, width, length, height, or to allow measuring or measurements in a fast manner. Therefore, the sign describes the kind, quality, intended purpose and/or other characteristics of the goods in question, such as one of their functions.
Given that the sign has a clear descriptive meaning, it is also devoid of any distinctive character and therefore objectionable under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR, as it is incapable of performing the essential function of a trade mark, which is to distinguish the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings.
The applicant failed to submit observations within the time limit. Consequently, further argumentation is superfluous. For the reasons set out in the letter of objection (attached), and pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) and (c) EUTMR and Article 7(2) EUTMR, the application for European Union trade mark No 18 033 502 is declared to be descriptive and non-distinctive in the English-speaking territories of the EU, at least in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Malta, for all the goods claimed.
According to Article 66(2) EUTMR, you have a right to appeal against this decision which does not terminate the examination proceedings. According to Article 68 EUTMR, notice of appeal must be filed in writing at the Office within two months of the date of notification of this decision. It must be filed in the language of the proceedings in which the decision subject to appeal was taken. Furthermore, a written statement of the grounds for appeal must be filed within four months of the same date. The notice of appeal will be deemed to have been filed only when the appeal fee of EUR 720 has been paid.
Once this decision has become final, the proceedings will be resumed for the examination of the subsidiary claim based upon Article 7(3) EUTMR and Article 2(2) EUTMIR.
María Mónica TARAZONA RUÁ
Avenida de Europa, 4 • E - 03008 • Alicante, Spain
Tel. +34 965139100 • www.euipo.europa.eu