OPPOSITION DIVISION
OPPOSITION Nо B 3 117 400
The CDA Group Ltd, Harby Road, Langar, Nottingham NG13 9HY, United Kingdom (opponent), represented by Biuro Ochrony Własności Intelektualnej Patent-Service Paweł Górnicki, ul. Rybojadzka 16, 60-443 Poznań, Poland (professional representative)
a g a i n s t
Matrix Industries, Inc., Suite 1190, 1455 Adams Drive, 94025 Menlo Park, United States of America (applicant), represented by Freischem & Partner Patentanwälte mbB, Salierring 47 - 53, 50677 Köln, Germany (professional representative).
On 26/01/2021, the Opposition Division takes the following
DECISION:
1. Opposition No B 3 117 400 is rejected in its entirety.
2. Each party bears its own costs.
REASONS
The
opponent filed an opposition against some of the goods
of European Union trade mark
application No 18 126 115
(figurative mark), namely against all the goods in Class 11. The
opposition is based on United Kingdom trade mark registration
No 2 286 909, ‘MATRIX’
and United Kingdom trade mark registration No 2 288 192,
.
The opponent invoked Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR.
On 01/02/2020, the United Kingdom (UK) withdrew from the European Union (EU) subject to a transition period until 31/12/2020. During this transition period, EU law remained applicable in the UK. As from 01/01/2021, UK rights ceased ex-lege to be earlier rights protected ‘in a Member State’ for the purposes of proceedings based on relative grounds. The conditions for applying Article 8(1) EUTMR, worded in the present tense, must also be fulfilled at the time of taking the decision.
As the opposition no longer has a valid basis, it must be dismissed.
COSTS
According to Article 109(1) EUTMR, the losing party in opposition proceedings must bear the fees and costs incurred by the other party. According to Article 109(3) EUTMR, where each party succeeds on some heads and fails on others, or if reasons of equity so dictate, the Opposition Division will decide a different apportionment of costs.
As the termination of the proceedings is due to exceptional statutory reasons not attributable to any of the parties, it is equitable that each party bears its own costs.
The Opposition Division
Begoña URIARTE VALIENTE |
Claudia SCHLIE |
According to Article 67 EUTMR, any party adversely affected by this decision has a right to appeal against this decision. According to Article 68 EUTMR, notice of appeal must be filed in writing at the Office within two months of the date of notification of this decision. It must be filed in the language of the proceedings in which the decision subject to appeal was taken. Furthermore, a written statement of the grounds for appeal must be filed within four months of the same date. The notice of appeal will be deemed to have been filed only when the appeal fee of EUR 720 has been paid.