Pecunia AS, Olav Vs gate 5, N-0161 Oslo, Norway (applicant), represented by Brann AB, Drottninggatan 27, 111 51 Stockholm, Sweden (professional representative)

a g a i n s t

Clenn S. Krommenhoek, Boekelosestraat 419, Nl-7548 AV Enschede, Netherlands (EUTM proprietor), represented by Merk-Echt B.V., Keizerstraat 7, Nl-4811 HL Breda, Netherlands (professional representative).

On 31/07/2020, the Cancellation Division takes the following


1. The application for revocation is upheld.

2. The EUTM proprietor’s rights in respect of European Union trade mark No 9 347 907 are revoked in their entirety as from 14/11/2019.

3. The EUTM proprietor bears the costs, fixed at EUR 1 080.


The applicant filed a request for revocation of European Union trade mark No 9 347 907 (figurative mark) (the EUTM). The request is directed against all the services covered by the EUTM, namely:

Class 35:

Advertising; publicity; business management; business administration; office functions; marketing; market prospecting, research and analysis; business consultancy; accounting; database management; business economic, business organisation and business administration consultancy; business services of an investment company; economic feasibility studies; commercial information; arranging events for publicity and/or commercial purposes; consultancy and information regarding the aforesaid services; the aforesaid services also provided via electronic networks, such as the Internet.

Class 36:

Insurance; financial affairs; monetary affairs; real estate affairs; financial services; financing services; financial feasibility studies; financial planning; credit and loan services; pensions; mortgaging; mediation with regard to providing of credit, loans, pensions and mortgages; property management; financial services of investment companies; services of a holding company, including financing of businesses; financial management of companies; financial analysis; investments; valuation, management (exploitation), letting and mediation regarding the leasing of real estate; financial consultancy relating to fiscal and tax issues; fiscal appraisal and valuation; consultancy and information regarding the aforesaid services, including via electronic networks, such as the Internet.

Class 45:

Legal services, including drawing up and concluding of contracts; consultancy and information regarding the aforesaid services, including via electronic networks, such as the Internet.

The applicant invoked Article 58(1)(a) EUTMR.


According to Article 58(1)(a) EUTMR, the rights of the proprietor of the European Union trade mark will be revoked on application to the Office, if, within a continuous period of five years, the trade mark has not been put to genuine use in the Union for the goods or services for which it is registered, and there are no proper reasons for non-use.

In revocation proceedings based on the grounds of non-use, the burden of proof lies with the EUTM proprietor as the applicant cannot be expected to prove a negative fact, namely that the mark has not been used during a continuous period of five years. Therefore, it is the EUTM proprietor who must prove genuine use within the European Union or submit proper reasons for non-use.

In the present case the EUTM was registered on 18/02/2011. The revocation request was submitted on 14/11/2019. Therefore, the EUTM had been registered for more than five years at the date of the filing of the request.

On 20/11/2019, the Cancellation Division duly notified the EUTM proprietor of the application for revocation and gave it a time limit of two months to submit evidence of use of the EUTM for all the services for which it is registered.

The EUTM proprietor did not submit any observations or evidence of use in reply to the application for revocation within the specified time limit.

According to Article 19(1) EUTMDR, if the proprietor of the European Union trade mark does not submit proof of genuine use of the contested mark within the time limit set by the Office, the European Union trade mark will be revoked.

In the absence of any reply from the EUTM proprietor, there is neither any evidence that the EUTM has been genuinely used in the European Union for any of the services for which it is registered nor any indications of proper reasons for non-use.

Pursuant to Article 62(1) EUTMR, the EUTM must be deemed not to have had, as from the date of the application for revocation, the effects specified in the EUTMR, to the extent that the proprietor’s rights have been revoked.

Consequently, the EUTM proprietor’s rights must be revoked in their entirety and deemed not to have had any effects as from 14/11/2019.


According to Article 109(1) EUTMR, the losing party in cancellation proceedings must bear the fees and costs incurred by the other party.

Since the EUTM proprietor is the losing party, it must bear the cancellation fee as well as the costs incurred by the applicant in the course of these proceedings.

According to Article 109(1) and (7) EUTMR and Article 18(1)(c)(ii) EUTMIR, the costs to be paid to the applicant are the cancellation fee and the costs of representation, which are to be fixed on the basis of the maximum rate set therein.

The Cancellation Division




According to Article 67 EUTMR, any party adversely affected by this decision has a right to appeal against this decision. According to Article 68 EUTMR, notice of appeal must be submitted in writing at the Office within two months of the date of notification of this decision. It must be submitted in the language of the proceedings in which the decision subject to appeal was taken. Furthermore, a written statement of the grounds of appeal must be submitted within four months of the same date. The notice of appeal will be deemed to be filed only when the appeal fee of EUR 720 has been paid.

Latest News

    May 28, 2021

    For the purpose of packaging of finished coils of cable and wire, Reelex Packaging Solutions, Inc. (“Reelex”) filed for the registration of its box designs under International Class 9 at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”).

    May 27, 2021

    Fleet Feet Inc, through franchises, company-owned retail stores, and online stores, sells running and fitness merchandise, and has 182 stores, including franchises, nationwide in the US.

  • UNO & UNA | DECISION 2661950
    May 22, 2021

    Marks And Spencer Plc, Waterside House, 35 North Wharf Road, London W2 1NW, United Kingdom, (opponent), represented by Boult Wade Tennant, Verulam Gardens, 70 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8BT, United Kingdom (professional representative)